Manuscript Preparation Guidelines

1. Research Articles

Purpose & Scope

Research articles present original theoretical, empirical or historical research of broader relevance. They should position their specific study in the context of established theories, research traditions or scholarly discourses. In the case of articles covering empirical research (quantitative or qualitative), authors must provide relevant documentation of methodological details and materials such as questionnaires, guidelines, code lists, coding instructions and examples, experimental stimuli, details of statistical analyses, information about samples and selection criteria. This information can be added as supplemental material (see below).Submissions should demonstrate:

Clear research problem and objectives
Engagement with contemporary scholarship
Methodological rigor
Analytical depth

Word Limit: 6,000 – 8,000 words (inclusive of references, excluding appendices)

We grant a moderate extension of the length of manuscripts (max. 10,000 words) for articles that rely on extensive quotation of excerpts from qualitative interviews or media analyses.

Detailed Structure

1	Title 12–20 words	Avoid abbreviations and overly broad phrasing Must reflect core variables, context, and scope
2	Abstract (150–250 words)	Must clearly include: Background/context Research objective(s) Methodology Key findings Conclusion/implications Avoid citations and undefined abbreviations
3	Keywords (4–6)	Use standardized academic terms Avoid repeating words from title
4	Introduction (800–1200 words)	Contextual background Problem statement Research gap Objectives and/or research questions Significance of study
5	Literature Review (1000–1500 words)	Thematic or chronological organization Critical (not descriptive) engagement Identification of gaps Conceptual/theoretical framework (if applicable)
6	Methodology (800–1200 words)	Must include: Research design (qualitative/quantitative/mixed) Sampling technique and size Data collection methods Tools/instruments used Analytical techniques Limitations of method Ethical considerations (consent, confidentiality, etc.)
7	Results / Analysis (1200–2000 words)	Logical presentation of findings Use of tables, charts where relevant Avoid raw data dumping Maintain clarity and coherence
8	Discussion (800–1200 words)	Interpretation of results Theoretical and practical implications
9	Conclusion (400–600 words)	Summary of findings Contribution to field Limitations Suggestions for future research
10	References (Not more that 100)	APA 7th Edition DOI mandatory where available Ensure consistency and completeness

2. Review Articles

Scope

Review / Policy Article provides critical analysis of existing policies, literature, or frameworks, offering synthesis and evaluative insights, through an overview of a particular research field on the basis of a literature survey. They should inform readers about the main research directions, theoretical claims, methodological approaches and available evidence.

Review articles should provide a list of reviewed publications along with a basic description as supplemental material. Reviewed articles that are individually referenced in the text must also be included in the reference list.

Word Limit: 4,000 – 6,000 words

Detailed Structure

1	Title (12–20 words)	Avoid abbreviations and overly broad phrasing Must reflect core variables, context, and scope
2	Abstract (150–250 words)	Must clearly include: Background/context Research objective(s) Methodology Key findings Conclusion/implications Avoid citations and undefined abbreviations
3	Keywords (4–6)	Use standardized academic terms Avoid repeating words from title
4	Introduction (600–800 words)	Context and rationale Scope of review Research questions or objectives
5	Method of Review (Optional but Recommended)	Selection criteria (databases, keywords) Inclusion/exclusion parameters
6	Thematic Analysis (Main Body)	Divide into clear sub-themes Compare and contrast studies/policies Highlight trends and patterns
7	Critical Evaluation	Strengths and weaknesses of existing work Identification of gaps Contradictions in literature
8	Policy Implications / Recommendations	Evidence-based suggestions Practical applicability
9	Conclusion	Synthesis of findings Contribution to discourse
10	References (Not more that 100)	APA 7th Edition DOI mandatory where available Ensure consistency and completeness

3. Commentary / Perspective Articles

Purpose

Commentary / Perspective Articles aim to provide expert synthesis, stimulate scholarly debate, and highlight future directions in the field. Unlike original research, these articles focus on interpreting and evaluating existing knowledge rather than presenting new empirical data.

Commentaries are concise, focused critiques or extensions of a specific study recently published in the Journal. Their primary goal is to offer unique insights into a particular paper’s methodology, findings, or implications.
Perspectives provide a broader, forward-looking assessment of concepts, models, or series of research. They are intended to reshape existing narratives, propose new hypotheses, or discuss the wider societal and policy impact of scientific progress.

Word Limit: 1,500 – 4,000 words

Detailed Structure

1	Title (12–20 words)	Engaging but academic May be slightly provocative but not sensational
2	Abstract (optional: 100–250 words)	Brief summary of argument
3	Keywords (4–6)	To support metadata
4	Introduction (300–500 words)	Context of issue Central argument/thesis
5	Argumentative Body	Logical progression of ideas Use of evidence/examples Engagement with limited literature
6	Critical Insight	Original perspective Analytical depth
7	Conclusion (200–300 words)	Reinforce argument Broader implications
8	References	Minimal but relevant APA 7th Edition

4. Book Reviews

Purpose

Book Reviews provide critical evaluations of recent, significant publications to help the scholarly community assess their relevance and impact. Rather than a simple summary, reviews should offer an analytical critique of the book’s arguments, methodology, and contribution to the field. Submissions must be professional and balanced and should preferably focus on works published within the last 24 months.

Word Limit: 800 – 1,500 words

Detailed Structure

1	Book Details (Mandatory)	Author(s) Full title Publisher, Year ISBN Page count
2	Introduction (150–200 words)	Context and relevance Author’s background (brief)
3	Summary (300–500 words)	Main arguments Structure of book
4	Critical Evaluation (300–600 words)	Strengths Weaknesses Contribution to field
5	Conclusion (100–200 words)	Overall assessment Target audience

4. Book

The Journal intends to expand its scholarly scope by introducing Edited Book Collections, offering future opportunities for researchers to contribute original Book Chapters to specialized thematic volumes. These collections will facilitate extensive theoretical development and in-depth case study analysis that may exceed the parameters of standard journal articles. Prospective contributors will be invited to submit a 300–500 word abstract for initial editorial assessment. Accepted proposals must result in full chapters of 5,000–8,000 words, which will undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to maintain the highest standards of academic excellence.

Note: Researchers can find the Call For Chapters, eventually on the main website in future.

Read Author Guidelines and Submission Guidelines carefully.