Skip to main content

Creating A Conducive Learning Environment

Abstract

This article critically examines the evolving relationship between constitutional provisions, particularly reservation policies and minority rights, and their impact on the socio-cultural environment of educational institutions in India. Initially conceived as temporary measures to address historical injustices arising from the caste system and untouchability, such provisions have, over time, expanded in scope and complexity. The paper argues that shifting political priorities, declining adherence to foundational values, and the increasing instrumentalisation of identity in democratic processes have contributed to the institutionalisation of caste and identity-based divisions. It further explores the implications of Article 30 and the challenges posed by policy frameworks that may unintentionally reinforce social fragmentation. The discussion highlights the lack of open deliberation on these “sensitive” issues and questions the effectiveness of recent regulatory interventions. Emphasising the importance of institutional autonomy and stakeholder responsibility, the article calls for a re-examination of constitutional provisions and policy practices to foster socially cohesive, inclusive, and conducive learning environments in line with the vision of the National Education Policy (2020).

References

1. Ambedkar, B. R. (2020). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and speeches (Vol. 2, 3rd reprint). Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Government of India.
2. Bayly, S. (2004). Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age. Cambridge University Press.
3. Deshpande, S., and Yadav, Y. (2006). Redesigning affirmative action: castes and benefits in higher education. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 41, 2419–2424. Available at: http://www. jstor.org/stable/4418341
4. Gupta, D. (2005). Caste and politics: Identity over system. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 34(1), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120649
5. Maheshwari, S. R. (1997). Reservation Policy in India: Theory and Practice. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 662-679 https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556119970335
6. Mandal, S. (2021). Caste and Reservation in India. International Journal.
7. Srinivas, M. N. (1957). Caste in modern India. J. Asian Stud. 16, 529–548. doi: 10.2307/2941637 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2941637
8. The Times of India. (2026). Supreme Court stays implementation of UGC Regulations on Equity. Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/127775787.cms